Mazda CX-3 (2016) vs. Ford Flex (2009) Specs

vs.

◆

2016 Mazda CX-3 and 2009 Ford Flex Specifications

Model Year	2016	2009
Model	Mazda CX-3	Ford Flex
Engine	2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 146 hp@6000 146 lb-ft@2800	3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 262 hp@6250 248 lb-ft@4500
Transmission	6-speed shiftable automatic	6-speed automatic
Drivetrain	AWD	AWD
Body	4dr SUV	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	101.2 in	117.9 in	-16.7 in
Length	168.3 in	202.3 in	-34 in
Width	69.6 in	75.9 in	-6.3 in
Height	60.7 in	67.6 in	-6.9 in
Curb Weight	2952 lb.	4700 lb.	-1748 lb.
Fuel Capacity	12.7 gal.	19.2 gal.	-6.5 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	38.4 in	41.8 in	-3.4 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	53.5 in	58.4 in	-4.9 in
Hip Room, Row 1	52.3 in	55.4 in	-3.1 in
Legroom, Row 1	41.7 in	40.8 in	0.9 in
Headroom, Row 2	37.2 in	40.5 in	-3.3 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	50.4 in	57.1 in	-6.7 in
Hip Room, Row 2	49.0 in	55.0 in	-6 in
Legroom, Row 2	35.0 in	44.3 in	-9.3 in
Headroom, Row 3	0.0 in	38.7 in	-38.7 in
Shoulder Room, Row 3	0.0 in	50.8 in	-50.8 in
Hip Room, Row 3	0.0 in	41.1 in	-41.1 in
Legroom, Row 3	0.0 in	33.4 in	-33.4 in
Total Legroom	76.7 in (over 2 rows)	118.5 in (over 3 rows)	-41.8 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	12.4 ft³	19.4 ft³	-7 ft³
Cargo Volume, Behind R2	12.4	45.0 ft³	-32.6
Cargo Volume, Maximum	44.5 ft³	86.7 ft³	-42.2 ft³

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-3

2016 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2016	The CX-3's driving position is very good, more car-like even than the HR-V's. The view forward is open. The view rearward, not so much, as the racy styling yields rear windows that are quite a bit smaller than the front ones. To help compensate, the outside mirrors are large plus blind sport warning is standard on the Touring and Grand Touring. The CX-3's driver seat is very comfortable and provides good lateral support in turns. The cloth center pocket is cushy without being mushy. Unlike in the HR-V and some others, the headrest does not jut uncomfortably far forward. But the lumbar bulge is not adjustable. As is, it fit my back well, but many people will wish for more of a bulge. The HR-V's also non-adjustable lumbar bulge was too pronounced for my taste. The JUKE's seats are comfortable, but for effective side bolsters (and then some) you must step up to the NISMO. Worth noting for those of you who get your coffee to go: the cup holders are located beneath the armrest (optional on the Sport, standard on the others). If you want to use them, then you can't use the armrest. see full Mazda CX-3 review

2016 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	For people who have no interest in a manual transmission (the great majority), the Mazda CX-3's largest shortcoming is a rear seat that is tight even by small car standards. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees pressed lightly against the front seat backs. I wasn't uncomfortable, but felt a little closed-in. A shame, as rear headroom is relatively plentiful and the rear seat is otherwise very comfortable. The HR-V provides about four inches more rear legroom, a big difference. According to their specs, the JUKE has three inches less rear legroom than the Mazda. In reality, though, I had perhaps an inch more rear knee room, but less rear headroom. The Nissan's rear seat might be slightly more adult-friendly than the Mazda's, but neither is a good choice if people taller than me will be sitting in both rows. see full Mazda CX-3 review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-3

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-3.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Ford Flex

2009 Ford Flex Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2010	4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD	Plenty of room in the first and second rows. The third row will fit an adult, but is better for the kids. see full Ford Flex review
2010	4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD	Tons of rear leg room. Can accommodate basketball players see full Ford Flex review
2010	4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD	Very comfortable and easy to adjust front seats with good materials, good controls, and sufficient room to stretch out your legs. see full Ford Flex review
2010	4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD	everything see full Ford Flex review
2009	4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD	My over 6 foot tall friends absolutely love my Flex because their knees never touch the backs of the front seats. The rear seat is like sitting in a stretch limo. With plenty of cup holders and storage for all to enjoy. see full Ford Flex review
2009	4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic AWD	Extremely comfortable and accomodating see full Ford Flex review
2009	4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD	The front seats exceptionally comfortable. They are large and supportive. see full Ford Flex review
2009	4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD	The second row seats have limo class legroom and are sofa comfy. The second row screams road trip. The third row seats are ample for cross town trips for adults (6ft folks will fit) and should be no problems for the smaller ones. see full Ford Flex review
2009	4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic AWD	Multiple seat settings and very comfortable seats. see full Ford Flex review
2009	4dr SUV 262-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic AWD	Lots of leg room. Comfy seats. Personal headphones are good, too. see full Ford Flex review

2009 Ford Flex Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2010	4dr SUV turbocharged 355hp 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Took awhile to think of something that could be improved but a bit larger area in the front drivers footwell would be appreciated. That's about it. see full Ford Flex review

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.