Chevrolet Camaro (2012) vs. Ford *Explorer Sport Trac (2006) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Chevrolet Camaro and 2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac specs.
2012 Chevrolet Camaro and 2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac Specifications
Model Year |
2012 |
2006 |
|
Model |
Chevrolet Camaro |
Ford *Explorer Sport Trac |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
2012 |
2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seat is small and unlike the nonconvertable does not have a center seat.
see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
2012 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 |
2dr Convertible 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seating is not meant for a Adult but a child or a set of golf clubs.. & a few complaints over the comfort.. in long drives.. any thing over a hour or more.
see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac
2007 |
4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
The seats are much improved over older explorers. You can ride for 4 hours and not feel tired when you get out of the truck. I have heated leather, which I recommend. The heat is in the lumbar, as well as seat bottom. Very nice seats.
see full Ford *Explorer Sport Trac review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Coupes and
Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all
Chevrolet models.