| Model Year | 2012 | 2010 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Camaro | Ford Explorer Sport Trac | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Convertible | 4dr SUT | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 112.3 in | 130.5 in | -18.2 in |
| Length | 190.4 in | 210.2 in | -19.8 in |
| Width | 75.5 in | 73.7 in | 1.8 in |
| Height | 54.7 in | 72.5 in | -17.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 3995 lb. | 4516 lb. | -521 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.8 gal. | 22.5 gal. | -3.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.8 in | 39.8 in | -2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.8 in | 59.0 in | -2.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 55.4 in | -55.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 42.4 in | 0 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 35.7 in | 38.5 in | -2.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 42.5 in | 58.9 in | -16.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 55.5 in | -55.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.9 in | 36.9 in | -7 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.3 in (over 2 rows) | 79.3 in (over 2 rows) | -7 in |
| Cargo Volume | 10.2 ft3 | 0.0 | 10.2 ft3 |
| 2012 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seat is small and unlike the nonconvertable does not have a center seat. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
| 2012 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Convertible 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seating is not meant for a Adult but a child or a set of golf clubs.. & a few complaints over the comfort.. in long drives.. any thing over a hour or more. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac.