Honda HR-V vs. Chrysler Concorde MPG

The graph does not display if there are fewer than five results.

Chart is based on 3 fuel economy reports for the Honda HR-V and 5 fuel economy reports for the Chrysler Concorde.

Honda HR-V MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2016	4dr SUV 141-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT AWD	hills	med	light	0	55	0	45	60	31.5
2016	4dr SUV 141-horsepower 1.8L I4 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD	flat	light	none	0	20	80	0	0	34.1
2016	4dr SUV 141-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD	hills	light	none	0	0	50	50	65	35.6

This page shows only averages. See all the Honda HR-V fuel economy data.

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2004	4dr Sedan 234-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	med	none	15	15	0	70	100	22.4
2002	4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	hills	light	light	7	17	21	55	63	24.2
2000	4dr Sedan 225-horsepower 3.2L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	none	0	1	9	90	80	24.2

This page shows only averages. See all the Chrysler Concorde fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models and Chrysler models.

Honda HR-V Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Comment
2016	With EPA ratings of 28 mpg city and 35 mpg highway, the front-wheel-drive Honda HR-V nearly leads the class in fuel economy; that honor goes to the Mazda CX-3, with 29/35. Add all-wheel drive and they tie with 27/32. The Trax trails by a 2-3 mpg in the city and a single mpg on the highway. In my real-world driving, though, the Chevrolet's trip computer reported better numbers than the Honda's. Was it accurate? I don't know. But if it was, the Trax was a little more efficient in my suburban driving, 37 mpg vs. 35 mpg, and considerably more efficient in my highway driving, 40 vs. 34 mpg. Granted, that the tested Trax lacked all-wheel drive could explain the observed difference in suburban mpg, if not the larger one in highway mpg. It should also be noted that the Trax's fuel efficiency is more dependent on driving style. Employ a heavy foot, and the tiny four's turbo will shove far more fuel-air mixture into the cylinders. Since the EPA figures aren't terribly far apart and the trips computers cast some doubt on their accuracy, I've judged this category a tie. Drive either CUV casually, and you'll enjoy fuel economy well beyond the reach of most cars. see full Honda HR-V review

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Honda HR-V.

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Chrysler Concorde.