2010 Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2006
MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

(2010) vs. Ford Ranger (2006) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 and 2006 Ford Ranger specs.

2010 and 2006 Ford Ranger Specifications

Model Year 2010 2006  
Model Ford Ranger  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010

2010 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 0 I'm tall (6'1" or 183cm) - and I have an abnormally long back. The Honda Jazz (or Honda Fit) (2002-2014) is one of the few cars I can comfortably sit in the back seat. In most small cars - and some large cars - I touch the roof. Plus, the origamiversatility of the seating, conversion into storage is brilliant - and better than many far larger cars. see full review
2010 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 0 Only 'just' adequate for me at 6'1"/183cm. Taller or longer-limbed drivers would have problems, probably. Headroom is excellent. see full review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Ranger

2006 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 The rear jump seats are suitable only for children. see full Ford Ranger review
2005 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range		 Rear compartment of Ranger extended cab is smaller and has side-facing jumpseats. see full Ford Ranger review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.