(2009) vs. Mazda CX-9 (2010) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2009 and 2010 Mazda CX-9 specs.
2009 and 2010 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
Model Year |
2009 |
2010 |
|
Model |
|
Mazda CX-9 |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009
2009 |
0 |
I'm tall (6'1" or 183cm) - and I have an abnormally long back. The Honda Jazz (or Honda Fit) (2002-2014) is one of the few cars I can comfortably sit in the back seat. In most small cars - and some large cars - I touch the roof. Plus, the origamiversatility of the seating, conversion into storage is brilliant - and better than many far larger cars.
see full review |
2009 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 |
0 |
Only 'just' adequate for me at 6'1"/183cm. Taller or longer-limbed drivers would have problems, probably. Headroom is excellent.
see full review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mazda CX-9
2011 |
4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave).
see full Mazda CX-9 review |
2009 |
4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Easy access to third row, good leg room in second and third row.
see full Mazda CX-9 review |
2009 |
4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Access to the 3rd row is better than any other 7 passenger SUV I drove.
see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all
Honda models.