We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Mitsubishi Lancer vs. Honda Fit MPG

Chart is based on 90 fuel economy reports for the Mitsubishi Lancer and 1555 fuel economy reports for the Honda Fit.

Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2014 21.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 19.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 20.6 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 29.2 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 26.4 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 20.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 21.3 MPG Highway Percentage 16 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 25.7 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 31.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 25.3 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 27.7 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 23.6 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 25.8 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 29.5 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 27.8 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 30.5 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 29.1 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 25.4 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 32.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 21.7 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 23.5 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 33.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 22.0 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 22.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 23.7 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 26.2 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 28.4 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med none 0 0 60 40 65 21.2  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med hvy 15 0 10 75 70 19.0  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 30 5 5 60 75 20.6  
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 5 20 10 65 63 29.2  
2011 4dr Hatch 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 25 20 25 30 75 26.4  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 5 15 40 40 75 20.0  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 19 16 49 16 110 21.3  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med none 10 21 36 33 67 25.7  
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 10 10 0 80 100 31.4  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 0 3 38 59 70 25.3  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
hills med none 6 12 41 41 120 27.7  
2009 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 6 6 34 55 70 23.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat lead none 14 21 22 43 76 25.8  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 10 21 23 45 88 29.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
flat light hvy 20 50 30 0 0 27.8  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 7 17 1 75 103 30.5  
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 7 20 33 40 83 21.0  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
hills med none 10 21 14 56 80 29.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat light none 7 24 10 59 86 25.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 0 0 20 80 70 32.4  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat med none 19 8 23 50 74 21.7  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat light none 5 28 5 63 60 23.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med none 16 16 12 57 79 25.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light hvy 0 20 0 80 70 33.4  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat light none 15 5 40 40 60 21.0  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat lead none 5 0 0 95 60 22.0  
2005 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 5 10 10 75 100 22.1  
2003 4dr Sedan turbocharged 271hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 1 4 8 88 70 23.7  
2003 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 0 25 0 75 65 27.0  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 7 19 37 37 55 26.2  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 18 13 25 45 65 28.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mitsubishi Lancer fuel economy data.

Honda Fit MPG

Honda Fit Honda Fit 2016 48.5 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2015 38.2 MPG Highway Percentage 62 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2013 31.3 MPG Highway Percentage 14 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2013 33.7 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2013 25.6 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2012 35.2 MPG Highway Percentage 68 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2012 38.3 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2012 38.4 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2011 34.4 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2011 34.4 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2011 33.2 MPG Highway Percentage 29 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2010 38.0 MPG Highway Percentage 51 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2010 38.6 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2010 34.9 MPG Highway Percentage 21 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2009 34.7 MPG Highway Percentage 51 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2009 34.9 MPG Highway Percentage 31 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2009 34.4 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2008 31.5 MPG Highway Percentage 54 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2008 35.2 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2008 34.2 MPG Highway Percentage 62 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2007 30.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2007 33.5 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Honda Fit Honda Fit 2007 32.5 MPG Highway Percentage 52 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2016 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.5L I4
CVT FWD
flat light none 0 10 80 10 60 48.5  
2015 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.5L I4
CVT FWD
flat light none 7 10 21 62 65 38.2  
2013 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 0 9 77 14 60 31.3  
2013 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 3 34 0 63 71 33.7  
2013 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 15 43 28 15 80 25.6  
2012 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 3 13 16 68 68 35.2  
2012 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat v.lt none 5 10 29 57 62 38.3  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2012 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 0 3 8 90 65 38.4  
2011 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 3 26 26 44 66 34.4  
2011 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed manual FWD
hills med light 8 22 26 45 68 34.4  
2011 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 8 10 54 29 59 33.2  
2010 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
hills light light 4 13 32 51 62 38.0  
2010 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 4 6 34 56 62 38.6  
2010 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 24 25 29 21 91 34.9  
2009 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light none 24 14 11 51 64 34.7  
2009 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light light 4 27 37 31 65 34.9  
2009 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 4 41 11 45 75 34.4  
2008 4dr Hatch 109-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med light 5 19 22 54 68 31.5  
2008 4dr Hatch 109-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 10 18 30 42 67 35.2  
2008 4dr Hatch 109-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 6 19 13 62 68 34.2  
2007 4dr Hatch 109-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med light 5 15 40 40 68 30.0  
2007 4dr Hatch 109-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 5 27 21 48 81 33.5  
2007 4dr Hatch 109-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat med none 8 25 16 52 80 32.5  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Honda Fit fuel economy data.

Mitsubishi Lancer vs. Honda Fit MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Mitsubishi Lancer and Honda Fit's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models and Honda models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Mitsubishi did improve the powertrain's EPA ratings a few years ago. But they're still only 22 mpg city, 31 highway. Even the portly Dart GT manages 23/33 with a manual transmission. Credit a sixth ratio the Lancer lacks. In my suburban driving, the trip computer regularly reported averages in the high 20s. Other compacts have done better in the same driving, but not by as wide a margin as the EPA numbers would suggest. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
I am getting consistent 27-29 MPG on mid-west (flat) back county roads during my commute. I am getting 32 MPG on the highway. My driving style is moderately spirited. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
Uses regular gas and gets about 30 mpg. My Civic SI was getting about the same but used premium. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Very good millage/power ratio see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
The car gets average fuel economy in its class, coming in at about 22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, but it is well above most cars. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
It's not as great as you'd expect from an econobox. If this is your biggest concern, this is not the car for you. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
17 mpg in 2.4 litter my altima that is 2.5 litter i get 23 same driving conditions hmm bigger engin better gas if it always worked out this way i would buy a bmw 335 xdrive see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
22-24 avarage MPG see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Honda Fit

Honda Fit Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2015 Hondas have been lagging the leaders in fuel economy. But with new "Earth Dreams" engines and CVT transmissions (pardon the redundancy), they've closed the gap. When fitted with the CVT (continuously variable transmission), the Fit LX rates 33 mpg city, 41 mpg highway in the EPA's tests. The city rating is especially impressive, and both figures are much better than the 2013 Fit's 28/35 (with a five-speed conventional automatic) and a little better than the Nissan Versa Note's 31/40 (with a CVT). You won't find a higher EPA city figure in any other non-diesel, non-hybrid car you'd want to drive. The highway figure, on the other hand, is matched or slightly exceeded by a few somewhat larger cars. Small yet tall hatchbacks are aerodynamically challenged. With a bit more poundage and stickier tires, the Fit EX and EX-L don't test quite as well, with scores of 32/38. But I doubt their real-world fuel economy would differ significantly from the LX's. The days when manual transmissions ruled the EPA charts are history. With a six-speed manual, the Honda Fit rates 29/37. While this is better than the 2013 5-speed manual's 27/33, the much zippier Ford Fiesta ST isn't far behind with 26/35. For those who like to row their own, another Fiesta variant, the SE EcoBoost with a three-cylinder turbocharged engine, is the way to go: 31/43. In my real-world suburban driving the trip computers of the Fit, Versa Note, and Fiesta SE EB all regularly reported averages over 40 and as high as the low 50s (with infrequent stops and a feather-light foot). see full Honda Fit review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Honda Fit

Honda Fit Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2013 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
driven normally, fuel economy better than EPA results. (But drops fairly quickly when trying to merge or accelerate along with normal flow of traffic) see full Honda Fit review
2012 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Owned less than a week but drive home after purchase was 60 miles and indications are the true mileage will exceed the EPA numbers as it shows 36mpg for half city and half congested freeway travel see full Honda Fit review
2012 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
Capable of 40 mpg on the highway with A/C running, 2 passengers and a load of cargo. see full Honda Fit review
2011 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
30 miles per gallon on average in mostly city driving averaging 30 miles per hour or less/stop&go. see full Honda Fit review
2011 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed manual FWD
30+ MPG even with a lot on stop and go. I got the 5 speed which actually may lower my MPG but I love the ability to punch it when I need to! Wish it had a 6th gear for 70 mph+ I want to see if I can hit 40-45 MPG going on I-10 doing 60-65 the whole way see full Honda Fit review
2011 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Regularly get 32-36 in town, have gotten 40 on the highway. see full Honda Fit review
2011 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed manual FWD
30 MPG in brutal, city driving; 40+ MPG on the highway. The fuel economy is better than I expected. see full Honda Fit review
2010 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
That it gets double my previous car. see full Honda Fit review
2010 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Fuel economy meter gives real-time feedback. see full Honda Fit review
2010 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed manual FWD
38MPG average in my driving community see full Honda Fit review
Honda Fit Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
Loses out slightly to the Fiesta in fuel economy. see full Honda Fit review
2010 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Although we got 38 mpg over the course of our 32,000 miles, we actually got better mileage with our previous 07 Civic over its lifetime and powertrain performance was much better for the Civic. Overall dissapointed with mileage. see full Honda Fit review
2009 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
I rented the car for a weekend & my gas mileage from Phoenix, to Flagstaff & back to Phoenix was only 28.8 mpg This car had an automatic tranny. Engine rmp always sounded BUSY & noisey see full Honda Fit review