MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Lincoln Navigator vs. Volkswagen Eos MPG

Chart is based on 6 fuel economy reports for the Lincoln Navigator and 31 fuel economy reports for the Volkswagen Eos.

Lincoln Navigator MPG

Lincoln Navigator Lincoln Navigator 2009 16.5 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Lincoln Navigator Lincoln Navigator 2007 13.0 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Lincoln Navigator Lincoln Navigator 2006 14.8 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Lincoln Navigator Lincoln Navigator 2003 11.8 MPG Highway Percentage 6 percent Lincoln Navigator Lincoln Navigator 2003 12.7 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2009 4dr SUV 310-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD		 flat light none 0 0 0 100 70 16.5  
2007 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic RWD		 flat light hvy 20 30 20 30 60 13.0  
2006 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic RWD		 flat med hvy 20 20 10 50 70 14.8  
2003 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic RWD		 flat med hvy 5 22 68 6 73 11.8  
2003 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range		 flat med light 0 60 10 30 60 12.7  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Lincoln Navigator fuel economy data.

Volkswagen Eos MPG

Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2013 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 1 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 30.0 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 31.0 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 28.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 28.8 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 27.1 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 35.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 23.8 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2013 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 0 23 76 1 70 21.0  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 0 50 50 65 30.0  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 15 0 85 60 31.0  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 6 19 0 75 65 28.1  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 9 15 33 43 63 28.8  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med none 9 15 42 35 68 27.1  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 140hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 5 15 80 75 35.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. 250-horsepower 3.2L V6
6-speed automated manual FWD		 hills lead light 3 10 10 78 78 23.8  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Volkswagen Eos fuel economy data.

Lincoln Navigator vs. Volkswagen Eos MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Lincoln Navigator and Volkswagen Eos's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Lincoln models and Volkswagen models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Lincoln Navigator

Lincoln Navigator Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2006 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range		 With an egg under my foot I am able to achieve 11.5mpg in town and 16.5 on the hwy. Don't forget this uses PREMIUM FUEL. see full Lincoln Navigator review
Lincoln Navigator Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2005 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8
6-speed automatic RWD		 I typically average 15-16 MPG in mixed suburban, highway, urban driving, with a 2 hour round-trip stop and go commute. While this is not bad, it is not good either. Even so, I have read several forums where Navigator owners complain about getting 12-13 MPG in mixed driving. I think they must be really stomping on it. The newer Navigators run on 87 octane but mine requires 91 to run properly, which really means that I have to fill it with 93 since no one sells 91 where I live. see full Lincoln Navigator review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Volkswagen Eos

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 On the freeway, I get 32 MPG with the cruise set at 65. Around town, I get about 30, driving conservatively. On my commute, I find that I get 27 if I drive like everyone else, zooming and stopping. If I make an effort to minimize braking, and coast on the hills and where ever possible, I’ve gotten as high as 35 MPG on the same route. The car does need 91 octane—it will run on 89 octane, but the mileage goes down, so it is a false economy. see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 31 mpg plus on road trips see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 For my short commute I average 25 mpg. Driving longer distances with the top up I get better than 32 mpg. see full Volkswagen Eos review
Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 I have averaged 27.3 MPG since new which in itself is not bad but the engine requires a minimum of 91 octane fuel. Based on availability that makes it require 93 octane fuel. If the added fuel cost is considered that effectively makes fuel cost the same as a car averaging 25 MPG using 87 octane fuel. Most of my driving is highway and I do not view this as economical for a 2 liter 4. My other car has a 35% more powerful engine and is both larger and heavier but has lower fuel cost. see full Volkswagen Eos review