Toyota Prius c vs. Chrysler Sebring MPG

Chart is based on 130 fuel economy reports for the Toyota Prius c and 59 fuel economy reports for the Chrysler Sebring.

Toyota Prius c MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2015	4dr Hatch 73-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	none	5	55	25	15	60	52.5
2014	4dr Hatch 73-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	none	0	2	52	47	61	47.6
2013	4dr Hatch 73-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	none	2	13	44	40	78	58.4
2012	4dr Hatch 73-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	flat	light	none	1	17	37	33	65	54.2

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Toyota Prius c fuel economy data.

Chrysler Sebring MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2010	4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	light	10	10	30	50	60	23.3
2009	4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	light	0	0	29	71	60	33.7
2008	4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	med	none	0	0	38	62	72	28.0
2008	2dr Convertible 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	flat	med	hvy	10	20	10	60	70	23.0
2008	2dr Convertible 189-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	none	5	23	5	68	68	27.1
2008	2dr Convertible 173-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	med	light	5	0	5	90	70	11.4
2006	2dr Convertible 200-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	hills	light	light	0	10	40	50	65	27.8
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2005	4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	hills	med	light	4	9	6	81	76	28.4
2004	2dr Convertible 200-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed shiftable automatic FWD	flat	light	light	0	5	75	20	60	20.5
2004	2dr Convertible 200-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	hills	lead	light	10	10	20	60	75	21.0
2003	4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	light	3	10	28	60	90	22.2
2002	4dr Sedan 142-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	light	none	0	0	0	100	100	29.4
2002	2dr Convertible 200-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed shiftable automatic FWD	flat	med	light	2	51	30	17	60	24.3
2002	2dr Convertible 200-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	flat	med	light	2	3	17	79	65	29.1
2000	2dr Convertible 163-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	hills	light	light	20	21	24	35	60	18.0

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Chrysler Sebring fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks

See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models and Chrysler models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Toyota Prius c

Toyota Prius c Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Comment
2012	The #1 benefit of the Prius c is obvious. It has the highest EPA ratings of any car, 53 miles-per-gallon in the city and 46 MPG highway. This noted, the EPA ratings for the larger, smoother, and more powerful regular Prius are almost as high in the city (51) and are actually a little better on the highway (48). The Prius c only goes significantly farther on a gallon of gas if you're willing and able to drive it with a very light right foot, especially when braking. Then you'll regularly observe over 60 in suburban driving. I observed as high as 82 for the trip from my house to my kids' school. see full Toyota Prius c review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Toyota Prius c

Toyota Prius c Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2013	4dr Hatch 73-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	Most of the time, I turn on the 'Eco mode'. Also, I switch the display to 'Eco Score' display. Following the guideline such that the power band is always within the 80% quantile of 'Eco' range, I can maintain roughly 49-51 mpg on the highway (speed between 55 to 70 mph, depending on the inclination). Overall, I can get 54-60 mpg due to the terrain in my commute that allow me using battery power completelyfor the last 1 mile of each trip. see full Toyota Prius c review
2012	4dr Hatch 73-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	In moderate to warm weather 50-80 degrees, this car will get 55-58 mpg in combined driving with careful operation. It drops 2-3 mpg in very cold weather or with heavy AC use. The MPG have never been as low as the window sticker. We have averaged 55 mpg over 7000 miles. see full Toyota Prius c review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chrysler Sebring

Chrysler Sebring Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	Excellent mileage for a car that will hold four with lots of room, about 30-34 mpg at freeway speeds. The 4 cylinder engine is not a hot rod but gets up to highway speed without making me feel nervous about merging. see full Chrysler Sebring review
2006	4dr Sedan 150-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	I get great fuel economy. Recently took it on a 700 km trip, and used on tank (60 litres!) see full Chrysler Sebring review
2005	4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	The car typically got about 30 MPG on long business trips. see full Chrysler Sebring review

Chrysler Sebring Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2010	4dr Sedan 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	This car guzzles gas like it's going out of style. Absolutely terrible in terms of fuel economy. My Dodge Journey with a 3.6L V6 is by far better on gas! see full Chrysler Sebring review
2007	4dr Sedan 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	I wish it could be better, but I asked for the 3.5L and I got the 3.5L. see full Chrysler Sebring review
2004	4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed automatic FWD	very poor gas milage during city driving - tank is very big - $20.00 from empty barely moves the needle. see full Chrysler Sebring review