Chevrolet SS (2017) vs. Subaru Forester (2010) Specs

vs.

◆

2017 Chevrolet SS and 2010 Subaru Forester Specifications

Model Year	2017	2010
Model	Chevrolet SS	Subaru Forester
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	4dr Sedan	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	114.8 in	103.0 in	11.8 in
Length	195.5 in	179.5 in	16 in
Width	74.7 in	70.1 in	4.6 in
Height	57.9 in	65.9 in	-8 in
Curb Weight	3997 lb.	3250 lb.	747 lb.
Fuel Capacity	18.8 gal.	16.9 gal.	1.9 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	38.7 in	41.6 in	-2.9 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	59.1 in	56.1 in	3 in
Hip Room, Row 1	57.2 in	0.0 in	57.2 in
Legroom, Row 1	42.3 in	43.1 in	-0.8 in
Headroom, Row 2	38.0 in	40.0 in	-2 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	59.0 in	55.6 in	3.4 in
Hip Room, Row 2	58.0 in	0.0 in	58 in
Legroom, Row 2	39.7 in	38.0 in	1.7 in
Total Legroom	82 in (over 2 rows)	81.1 in (over 2 rows)	0.9 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	16.4 ft³	33.5 ft³	-17.1 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	16.4 ft³	68.3 ft³	-51.9 ft³

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS

2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2017	4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD	Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review

2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2017	4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD	The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Subaru Forester

2010 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2011	4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	The rear seat room is generous. see full Subaru Forester review
2010	4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Enough room to feel comfortable, even at 6 feet tall. The fact that the Premium Trim package allows rear seats to recline a bit helps a lot as well. see full Subaru Forester review
2010	4dr SUV turbocharged 224hp 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	leather seat "baquet" has very good lateral control, but leather is slippery on braking see full Subaru Forester review
2009	4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	ample rear seat room for car seats and adults alike see full Subaru Forester review
2009	4dr SUV turbocharged 224hp 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	well padded and shaped, power seat controls allows good positioning. see full Subaru Forester review
2009	4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Lost of room for the kids. see full Subaru Forester review
2009	4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD	It fits my kids (three) better than 2001 Outback, the rear seat "hump" is less proeminent than in other Subaru models (Outback namely), good hip and shoulder room see full Subaru Forester review
2009	4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD	Big enough for growing children; enough leg room for tall driver see full Subaru Forester review
2009	4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Easily fits people over 6 foot in fron with plenty of room in back for passengers - much better than previous generation Forester. see full Subaru Forester review
2009	4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Rear seats are very comfortable, lots of space, excellent for wife and kid. see full Subaru Forester review

2010 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2009	4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Great for an average women. Too narrow for fit 6 foot man, especially in the back cushion. see full Subaru Forester review

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans

See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.