2008 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

(2008) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2013) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2008 and 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque specs.

2008 and 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Specifications

Model Year 2008 2013  
Model Land Rover Range Rover Evoque  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2008 .

Be the first!

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Audi models.