| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Acura RDX and 2016 Cadillac ATS Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
| Model | Acura RDX | Cadillac ATS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,649 mm | 2,776 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,590 mm | 4,643 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,869 mm | 1,806 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,656 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,698 kg | 1,530 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 61 L | 7 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 980 mm | 3 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,478 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,382 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,080 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 935 mm | 38 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,346 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 851 mm | 104 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,017 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 787 L | 289 L | 498 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,716 L | 10.2 | -9.2 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Acura RDX
| 2010 Acura RDX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
back support is excellent see full Acura RDX review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
For, supportive, yet easy to find a comfortable position. see full Acura RDX review |
| 2010 Acura RDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Too little leg room see full Acura RDX review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
| 2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
