Acura RDX (2010) vs. Chevrolet SS (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 Acura RDX and 2016 Chevrolet SS specs.
2010 Acura RDX and 2016 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year |
2010 |
2016 |
|
| Model |
Acura RDX |
Chevrolet SS |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Sedan |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
104.3 in |
114.8 in |
-10.5 in |
| Length |
180.7 in |
195.5 in |
-14.8 in |
| Width |
73.6 in |
74.7 in |
-1.1 in |
| Height |
65.2 in |
57.9 in |
7.3 in |
| Curb Weight |
3743 lb. |
3997 lb. |
-254 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity |
18.0 gal. |
18.8 gal. |
-0.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
38.7 in |
38.7 in |
0 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
58.2 in |
59.1 in |
-0.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
54.4 in |
57.2 in |
-2.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
41.8 in |
42.3 in |
-0.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
38.3 in |
38.0 in |
0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
56.3 in |
59.0 in |
-2.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
53.0 in |
58.0 in |
-5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
37.6 in |
39.7 in |
-2.1 in |
| Total Legroom |
79.4 in (over 2 rows) |
82 in (over 2 rows) |
-2.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
27.8 ft3 |
16.4 ft3 |
11.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
60.6 ft3 |
16.4 ft3 |
44.2 ft3 |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Acura RDX
| 2010 |
4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
back support is excellent
see full Acura RDX review |
| 2010 |
4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
For, supportive, yet easy to find a comfortable position.
see full Acura RDX review |
| 2010 Acura RDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 |
4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Too little leg room
see full Acura RDX review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 |
Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat.
Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVsSee TrueDelta's information for all
Acura models.
