| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Acura RDX and 2018 Hyundai Elantra GT Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2018 | |
| Model | Acura RDX | Hyundai Elantra GT | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.3L I4 DOHC-4v 179 kW@6000 353 Nm@4500 |
turbocharged 1.6L I4 DOHC-4v 150 kW@6000 264 Nm@1500 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed automated manual | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,649 mm | 2,649 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,590 mm | 4,341 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,869 mm | 1,781 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,656 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,698 kg | 1,391 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 53 L | 15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 993 mm | -10 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,478 mm | 1,427 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,382 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,072 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 978 mm | -5 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,346 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 884 mm | 71 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,017 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,956 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 787 L | 705 L | 82 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,716 L | 1,560 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Acura RDX
| 2010 Acura RDX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
back support is excellent see full Acura RDX review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
For, supportive, yet easy to find a comfortable position. see full Acura RDX review |
| 2010 Acura RDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Too little leg room see full Acura RDX review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Hyundai Elantra GT
| 2018 Hyundai Elantra GT Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats are comfortable and supportive in both cars, with Hyundai's likely agreeable for a wider range of body sizes and types. And the rear seat? Here we have another area where the Elantra Touring excelled, but neither Elantra GT has. The culprit this time isn't design, but a decision by those who make the big bucks at the corporate level. Hyundai offers Europeans the i30 (the same car with a different model name) in two lengths. These are marketed as a hatchback and as an estate or touring or tourer or kombi or whatever other label might help sell what Americans call station wagons. With the Elantra Touring, we got the latter, and consequently far more rear seat room and cargo carrying capacity than in any other compact hatchback. But we didn't buy the car. So with the first and second Elantra GT we've been getting the much less lengthy, more athletically proportioned hatchback. As it stands (or rather, sits), the Elantra GT's rear seat shouldn't be condemned as useless unless you're a driver of above-average height with similarly sized passsengers. At 5-9, I fit behind a driver seat set for myself with perhaps three inches between my knees and the seat back and about a half-inch to spare between the top of my head and the headliner (in a two-pedal Elantra GT with the optional sunroof). But people even a couple inches taller than me will feel cramped. The rear seats in the GTI and Civic are roomier. One plus in the Elantra GT's column: its rear seat passengers get air vents. The Civic's don't. In terms of cargo space the Elantra GT is more competitive, but nothing special the way it was with the Elantra Touring. see full Hyundai Elantra GT review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Hyundai Elantra GT
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Hyundai Elantra GT.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
