Acura TL (2014) vs. Chevrolet SS (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2014 Acura TL and 2016 Chevrolet SS specs.
2014 Acura TL and 2016 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year |
2014 |
2016 |
|
| Model |
Acura TL |
Chevrolet SS |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr Sedan |
4dr Sedan |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
2,776 mm |
2,916 mm |
0 mm |
| Length |
4,928 mm |
4,966 mm |
0 mm |
| Width |
1,880 mm |
1,897 mm |
0 mm |
| Height |
1,453 mm |
1,471 mm |
0 mm |
| Curb Weight |
1,690 kg |
1,813 kg |
0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity |
70 L |
71 L |
-1 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
975 mm |
983 mm |
-8 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,478 mm |
1,501 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,415 mm |
1,453 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
1,080 mm |
1,074 mm |
0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
932 mm |
965 mm |
-33 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,427 mm |
1,499 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,392 mm |
1,473 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
919 mm |
1,008 mm |
918 mm |
| Total Legroom |
1,999 mm (over 2 rows) |
2,083 mm (over 2 rows) |
-1 mm |
| Cargo Volume |
371 L |
464 L |
-93 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Acura TL
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Acura TL.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 |
Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat.
Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SedansSee TrueDelta's information for all
Acura models.
