| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Acura TLX and 2009 Cadillac SRX Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2009 | |
| Model | Acura TLX | Cadillac SRX | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 216 kW@6200 362 Nm@4500 |
4.6L V8 DOHC-4v 239 kW@6400 427 Nm@4400 |
|
| Transmission | 9-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,957 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,869 mm | 4,950 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,854 mm | 1,844 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,448 mm | 1,722 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,708 kg | 2,015 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 65 L | 76 L | -11 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 945 mm | 1,024 mm | 944 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,461 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,082 mm | 1,069 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 932 mm | 975 mm | -43 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,407 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,394 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 876 mm | 1,041 mm | 875 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 889 mm | -889 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,107 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,400 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 615 mm | -615 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,958 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,725 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 405 L | 238 L | 167 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 14.3 | 917 L | -902.7 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 14.3 | 1,968 L | 13.3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Acura TLX
| 2020 Acura TLX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| It might seem unfair to compare the Acura TLX to the Genesis G70, as the latter is considerably smaller: 194.6 vs. 184.4 inches long, 75.2 vs. 72.8 inches wide, and 56.4 vs. 55.1 inches tall. The TLX is also two-to-three-hundred pounds heavier, 3,709 vs. 3,516 pounds for the 2WD fours, 4,221 vs. 3,887 pounds for the AWD V6s. In fact, compared to the second Legend--which seemed like a fairly large car in the early 1990s--the new TLX is virtually as long, four inches wider, and an inch taller. The car that was intended to replace the TSX as well as the TL has grown to the size of the final TL, which many (including me) thought too large, and weighs about 250 pounds more. Size and weight aren't good for handling agility, performance, or fuel efficiency. So, to keep match-ups fair in these and other areas, normally I compare cars that are close in size. But, the thing is, part of the cost of the TLX's dramatically lengthened dash-to-axle is a rear seat with no more legroom than in the smaller G70. Also, despite the TLX's additional width and height, it provides only slightly more rear shoulder room and less rear headroom than the rear-drive Genesis. Adults any taller than the average man will find the TLX's rear seat a tight fit. The Kia Stinger, which is a half-foot longer than the G70 but still a few inches shorter than the TLX, provides a useful additional inch-and-a-half of legroom. Front-wheel-drive transverse powertrains were originally adopted because, when turned sideways, the engine and transmission take up much less of a car's length. By taking a conventional front-wheel-drive powertrain and merely shifting it forward nearly eight inches, while only adding half as much to the wheelbase, Acura has sacrificed this advantage, and then some.* The no-longer-closely-related Honda Accord is 2.4 inches less lengthy but has 5.3 inches more legroom--a huge difference. Add these two number up and you get...the TLX's increased dash-to-axle. The Accord also weighs 300 pounds less. Acura's been here before--with the Vigor. Okay, not quite. The Vigor's rear seat was so tight only children and small adults fit. The new TLX has about 3.5 more inches of legroom. This not only brings it even with the G70, but if you compare its shoulder and leg room to those of the best-selling 3rd TL you'll find they're surprsingly close. A coincidence? I doubt it. But some people might expect more from the new TLX given its larger exterior. * One alternative at least one manufacturer has considered: rotating a transverse powertrain 180 degrees, putting the engine behind the axle rather than ahead of it. The decreased front overhang this would enable would compensate for the increased dash-to-axle, and together they would yield even better proportions. But no one has produced a car with such a layout. The impediment for Acura or Audi: it would make AWD very difficult. see full Acura TLX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Acura TLX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Acura TLX.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Cadillac SRX
| 2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
