| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Acura TLX and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2012 | |
| Model | Acura TLX | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,834 mm | 4,105 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,854 mm | 1,694 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,448 mm | 1,524 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,580 kg | 1,132 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 65 L | 40 L | 25 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 945 mm | 1,026 mm | 944 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,461 mm | 1,339 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,082 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 932 mm | 991 mm | -59 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,407 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,394 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 876 mm | 876 mm | 0 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,958 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 374 L | 583 L | -209 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.2 | 1,623 L | 12.2 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Acura TLX
| 2016 Acura TLX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| While the Acura TLX's exterior dimensions roughly split the difference between the TSX's and the TL's, its interior dimensions are quite close to the more compact of the two. Compared to the Honda Accord, rear seat legroom is down a substantial four inches despite a shared wheelbase. Shoulder room and rear headroom also suffer reductions, of about an inch in each case. At 5-9, I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare. Passengers six feet and up will feel cramped, if they fit at all. The Lincoln is also weak in this area. If others an inch or two more rear knee room than the TLX, but less rear headroom. see full Acura TLX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Acura TLX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Acura TLX.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
