| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Audi A5 / S5 and 2018 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2018 | |
| Model | Audi A5 / S5 | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 108.3 in | 106.2 in | 2.1 in |
| Length | 182.1 in | 179.1 in | 3 in |
| Width | 73.0 in | 72.5 in | 0.5 in |
| Height | 54.0 in | 65.3 in | -11.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3682 lb. | 3563 lb. | 119 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.9 gal. | 14.8 gal. | 2.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.1 in | 39.7 in | -0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.3 in | 57.1 in | -2.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 55.2 in | -55.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 41.0 in | 0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.0 in | 39.0 in | -3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.8 in | 54.8 in | -2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 55.3 in | -55.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 31.7 in | 39.6 in | -7.9 in |
| Total Legroom | 73 in (over 2 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | -7.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.0 ft3 | 30.9 ft3 | -18.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 12.0 ft3 | 59.6 ft3 | -47.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Audi A5 / S5
| 2010 Audi A5 / S5 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 354-horsepower 4.2L V8 6-speed manual AWD |
I am 6'-7" tall. Audi builds cars that I can fit into comfortably. My 1998 A4 was the first car that truly fit me, and the S5 is just as good, if not better. see full Audi A5 / S5 review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe 265-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
very comfortable seating, especially with S-line package see full Audi A5 / S5 review |
| 2010 Audi A5 / S5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe turbocharged 211hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual AWD |
nonexistent see full Audi A5 / S5 review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe turbocharged 170hp 2.0L I4 Diesel 6-speed manual AWD |
Not room enough for sufficient leg space for both front and rear passengers at the same time. Rear seat room is tight. Makes you want to avoid having rear passengers in the car. Typical for a 2-door. see full Audi A5 / S5 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
| 2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.
See TrueDelta's information for all Audi models.
