| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Audi A5 / S5 and 2012 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
| Model | Audi A5 / S5 | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 108.3 in | 102.4 in | 5.9 in |
| Length | 182.1 in | 171.9 in | 10.2 in |
| Width | 73.0 in | 69.5 in | 3.5 in |
| Height | 54.0 in | 61.4 in | -7.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 3682 lb. | 2865 lb. | 817 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.9 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 3.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.1 in | 40.5 in | -1.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.3 in | 53.3 in | 1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 52.3 in | -52.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 41.6 in | -0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.0 in | 39.3 in | -3.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.8 in | 52.6 in | 0.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 43.7 in | -43.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 31.7 in | 36.2 in | -4.5 in |
| Total Legroom | 73 in (over 2 rows) | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | -4.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.0 ft3 | 19.8 ft3 | -7.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 12.0 ft3 | 61.5 ft3 | -49.5 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Audi A5 / S5
| 2010 Audi A5 / S5 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 354-horsepower 4.2L V8 6-speed manual AWD |
I am 6'-7" tall. Audi builds cars that I can fit into comfortably. My 1998 A4 was the first car that truly fit me, and the S5 is just as good, if not better. see full Audi A5 / S5 review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe 265-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
very comfortable seating, especially with S-line package see full Audi A5 / S5 review |
| 2010 Audi A5 / S5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe turbocharged 211hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual AWD |
nonexistent see full Audi A5 / S5 review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe turbocharged 170hp 2.0L I4 Diesel 6-speed manual AWD |
Not room enough for sufficient leg space for both front and rear passengers at the same time. Rear seat room is tight. Makes you want to avoid having rear passengers in the car. Typical for a 2-door. see full Audi A5 / S5 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Toyota Matrix
| 2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Audi models.
