Model Year | 2016 | 2012 | |
Model | Audi Q3 | Ford Taurus | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 102.5 in | 112.9 in | -10.4 in |
Length | 172.8 in | 202.9 in | -30.1 in |
Width | 72.1 in | 76.2 in | -4.1 in |
Height | 62.6 in | 60.7 in | 1.9 in |
Curb Weight | 3494 lb. | 4015 lb. | -521 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 16.9 gal. | 20.0 gal. | -3.1 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 37.0 in | 39.0 in | -2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.8 in | 57.9 in | -2.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 56.3 in | -56.3 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 40.0 in | 41.9 in | -1.9 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 37.4 in | 37.8 in | -0.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.6 in | 56.9 in | -3.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 55.8 in | -55.8 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 31.1 in | 38.1 in | -7 in |
Total Legroom | 71.1 in (over 2 rows) | 80 in (over 2 rows) | -8.9 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.7 ft3 | 20.1 ft3 | -3.4 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 48.2 ft3 | 20.1 ft3 | 28.1 ft3 |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Audi Q3.
2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably! see full Ford Taurus review |
2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |