Audi Q3 (2016) vs. Toyota Matrix (2006) Specs

vs.

◆

2016 Audi Q3 and 2006 Toyota Matrix Specifications

Model Year	2016	2006
Model	Audi Q3	Toyota Matrix
Engine	turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 200 hp@5100 207 lb-ft@1700	1.8L I4 DOHC-4v 164 hp@7600 126 lb-ft@4400
Transmission	6-speed shiftable automatic	6-speed manual
Drivetrain	FWD	FWD
Body	4dr SUV	4dr Hatch
			Difference
Wheelbase	102.5 in	102.4 in	0.1 in
Length	172.8 in	171.3 in	1.5 in
Width	72.1 in	69.9 in	2.2 in
Height	62.6 in	61.6 in	1 in
Curb Weight	3494 lb.	2800 lb.	694 lb.
Fuel Capacity	16.9 gal.	13.2 gal.	3.7 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	37.0 in	40.6 in	-3.6 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	55.8 in	53.2 in	2.6 in
Hip Room, Row 1	0.0 in	51.7 in	-51.7 in
Legroom, Row 1	40.0 in	41.8 in	-1.8 in
Headroom, Row 2	37.4 in	39.8 in	-2.4 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	53.6 in	52.6 in	1 in
Hip Room, Row 2	0.0 in	47.8 in	-47.8 in
Legroom, Row 2	31.1 in	36.3 in	-5.2 in
Total Legroom	71.1 in (over 2 rows)	78.1 in (over 2 rows)	-7 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	16.7 ft³	21.8 ft³	-5.1 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	48.2 ft³	53.2 ft³	-5 ft³

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Audi Q3.

2006 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2007	4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	a lot of place, even for tall people. see full Toyota Matrix review
2005	4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	Lots of room in rear seats while both front seats are being used, enough room for 5 adults. see full Toyota Matrix review

2006 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2007	4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	very uncomfortable and not ergonomic at all. especially with child sits. see full Toyota Matrix review
2007	4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD	Were flat and didnt grip you well see full Toyota Matrix review

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Audi models.