| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Audi Q7 and 2017 Ford C-MAX Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2017 | |
| Model | Audi Q7 | Ford C-MAX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,002 mm | 2,649 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,085 mm | 4,409 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,984 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,737 mm | 1,623 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,275 kg | 1,651 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 100 L | 51 L | 49 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,003 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,491 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,379 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,001 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,476 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,318 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 942 mm | 927 mm | 15 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,234 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 742 mm | 0 mm | 742 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,733 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 309 L | 694 L | -385 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,136 L | 24.5 | -23.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,512 L | 1,489 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Audi Q7
| 2009 Audi Q7 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 280-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The middle seat of all the SUVs we looked at, had the most room to move furthest forward or backward to allow far rear seat passengers most accommodation. see full Audi Q7 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Ford C-MAX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Ford C-MAX.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Audi models.
