

Model Year | 2013 | 2014 | |
Model | Audi Q7 | Ford C-MAX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 118.2 in | 104.3 in | 13.9 in |
Length | 200.3 in | 173.6 in | 26.7 in |
Width | 78.1 in | 72.0 in | 6.1 in |
Height | 68.4 in | 63.9 in | 4.5 in |
Curb Weight | 5192 lb. | 3607 lb. | 1585 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 26.4 gal. | 13.5 gal. | 12.9 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.5 in | 41.0 in | -1.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.7 in | 55.9 in | 2.8 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 54.3 in | -54.3 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 40.4 in | 0.9 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 39.4 in | -0.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.1 in | 55.2 in | 2.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 51.9 in | -51.9 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 37.1 in | 36.5 in | 0.6 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 35.6 in | 0.0 in | 35.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 48.6 in | 0.0 in | 48.6 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 29.2 in | 0.0 in | 29.2 in |
Total Legroom | 107.6 in (over 3 rows) | 76.9 in (over 2 rows) | 30.7 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 10.9 ft3 | 24.5 ft3 | -13.6 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 42.0 ft3 | 24.5 | 17.5 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 72.5 ft3 | 52.6 ft3 | 19.9 ft3 |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Audi Q7.
2014 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Ford C-MAX.