| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2018 Audi Q7 and 2015 Ford Transit Connect Specifications
| Model Year | 2018 | 2015 | |
| Model | Audi Q7 | Ford Transit Connect | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,995 mm | 3,063 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 5,070 mm | 4,818 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,969 mm | 1,834 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,740 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,130 kg | 1,805 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 85 L | 60 L | 25 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 975 mm | 1,191 mm | 974 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,511 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,387 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 986 mm | 1,146 mm | 985 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,486 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,486 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 986 mm | 955 mm | 31 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 912 mm | 1,049 mm | 911 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,255 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,194 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 742 mm | 889 mm | -147 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,786 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,868 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 419 L | 561 L | -142 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,062 L | 1,668 L | 0 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,027 L | 2,951 L | 0 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Audi Q7
| 2018 Audi Q7 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Now that the Audi Q7's price and styling have been given their due, my other "why nots" are much less clear cut. You sit SUV-high in the new Audi Q7, even higher (if memory serves) than in the Volvo, and certainly higher than in the relatively car-like Acura. While the commanding view over traffic will appeal to many drivers, they're less likely to enjoy the Q7's high floor. The step up won't be an easy one for shorter or older drivers. They'll want running boards. For such a beamy vehicle, with about two inches more shoulder room than in the far-from-narrow Volvo XC90, the Audi Q7 has unexpectedly little stretch out room in the front seats. The culprit: an unusually high and wide center console. The XC90, with a much narrower and lower console, feels roomier--but not as sporty. see full Audi Q7 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Audi Q7
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Audi Q7.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect
| 2015 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Audi models.
