Audi Q7 (2019) vs. Toyota Prius (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2019 Audi Q7 and 2016 Toyota Prius specs.
2019 Audi Q7 and 2016 Toyota Prius Specifications
Model Year |
2019 |
2016 |
|
Model |
Audi Q7 |
Toyota Prius |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Hatch |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
2,995 mm |
2,700 mm |
0 mm |
Length |
5,070 mm |
4,539 mm |
1 mm |
Width |
1,969 mm |
1,760 mm |
0 mm |
Height |
1,740 mm |
1,476 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
2,145 kg |
1,395 kg |
1 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
85 L |
43 L |
42 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
1,013 mm |
1,001 mm |
0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,511 mm |
1,397 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
0 mm |
1,356 mm |
-1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,059 mm |
1,097 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
986 mm |
950 mm |
36 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,486 mm |
1,346 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
0 mm |
1,318 mm |
-1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
986 mm |
848 mm |
138 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 |
912 mm |
0 mm |
912 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
1,255 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 |
742 mm |
0 mm |
742 mm |
Total Legroom |
2,786 mm (over 3 rows) |
1,946 mm (over 2 rows) |
1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
419 L |
697 L |
-278 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
1,062 L |
24.6 |
-23.6 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
2,027 L |
1,775 L |
1 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Audi Q7
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Audi Q7.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
2016 |
For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan.
The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable.
The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia.
Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX.
see full Toyota Prius review |
2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited.
Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility.
see full Toyota Prius review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Audi models.