| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2018 Audi R8 and 2011 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2018 | 2011 | |
| Model | Audi R8 | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,649 mm | 2,875 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,427 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,941 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,240 mm | 1,727 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,695 kg | 1,964 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 90 L | 76 L | 14 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 1,006 mm | 977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,435 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 991 mm | -991 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,491 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,422 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,011 mm | -1 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,445 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,110 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 823 mm | -823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,039 mm (over 1 row) | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 113 L | 487 L | -374 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 4.0 | 1,368 L | 3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 227 L | 2,852 L | 225 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Audi R8
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Audi R8.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mazda CX-9
| 2011 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Audi models.
