Audi TT (2016) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2013) Specs

vs.

◆

2016 Audi TT and 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Specifications

Model Year	2016	2013
Model	Audi TT	Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	2dr Hatch	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	98.6 in	104.8 in	-6.2 in
Length	164.7 in	171.5 in	-6.8 in
Width	72.1 in	77.4 in	-5.3 in
Height	53.2 in	64.4 in	-11.2 in
Curb Weight	3164 lb.	3680 lb.	-516 lb.
Fuel Capacity	14.5 gal.	18.5 gal.	-4 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	37.1 in	40.3 in	-3.2 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	53.6 in	56.6 in	-3 in
Legroom, Row 1	41.1 in	43.1 in	-2 in
Headroom, Row 2	33.8 in	39.7 in	-5.9 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	47.9 in	55.4 in	-7.5 in
Legroom, Row 2	28.9 in	35.7 in	-6.8 in
Total Legroom	70 in (over 2 rows)	78.8 in (over 2 rows)	-8.8 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	12.0 ft³	20.3 ft³	-8.3 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	25.1 ft³	51.0 ft³	-25.9 ft³

2016 Audi TT Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2016	The new Audi TT's seats rank among the best for support and comfort, something of a surprise since they are in a sports car, not a luxury sedan, and don't have many adjustments. The more powerful, more expensive TTS has front seats with adjustable side bolsters, but these aren't offered in the regular TT. The sport package for the BMW 2 Series includes seats with adjustable bolsters, yet they can't be made to fit my form as well as the Audi's do. Nor can those in larger, more expensive Audis. Puzzling. see full Audi TT review

2016 Audi TT Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	Many people will probably leave the rear seat folded, as head room and legroom are both scant. People much over five feet in height simply won't fit. Even a BMW 2 Series has a considerably roomier rear seat. see full Audi TT review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Audi TT.

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2012	4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Convertibles.

See TrueDelta's information for all Audi models.