Model Year | 2014 | 2020 | |
Model | Audi TT | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,469 mm | 2,697 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,178 mm | 4,549 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,359 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,430 kg | 1,606 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 62 L | 56 L | 6 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 958 mm | 1,008 mm | 957 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,351 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,402 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,044 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 828 mm | 991 mm | -163 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,207 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,405 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 742 mm | 1,006 mm | 741 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,786 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 371 L | 875 L | -504 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 699 L | 1,688 L | 698 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Audi TT.
2020 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5.