Audi TT (2016) vs. Mazda CX-9 (2011) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 Audi TT and 2011 Mazda CX-9 specs.
2016 Audi TT and 2011 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year |
2016 |
2011 |
|
| Model |
Audi TT |
Mazda CX-9 |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
2dr Hatch |
4dr SUV |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
2,504 mm |
2,875 mm |
0 mm |
| Length |
4,183 mm |
5,085 mm |
-1 mm |
| Width |
1,831 mm |
1,935 mm |
0 mm |
| Height |
1,351 mm |
1,727 mm |
0 mm |
| Curb Weight |
1,435 kg |
1,964 kg |
0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity |
55 L |
76 L |
-21 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
942 mm |
1,006 mm |
941 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,361 mm |
1,509 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
0 mm |
1,435 mm |
-1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
1,044 mm |
1,039 mm |
0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
859 mm |
991 mm |
-132 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,217 mm |
1,491 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
0 mm |
1,422 mm |
-1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
734 mm |
1,011 mm |
733 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 |
0 mm |
899 mm |
-899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
0 mm |
1,445 mm |
-1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 |
0 mm |
1,110 mm |
-1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 |
0 mm |
823 mm |
-823 mm |
| Total Legroom |
1,778 mm (over 2 rows) |
2,873 mm (over 3 rows) |
-1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
340 L |
487 L |
-147 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
12.0 |
1,368 L |
11 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
711 L |
2,852 L |
709 L |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Audi TT
| 2016 |
The new Audi TT's seats rank among the best for support and comfort, something of a surprise since they are in a sports car, not a luxury sedan, and don't have many adjustments. The more powerful, more expensive TTS has front seats with adjustable side bolsters, but these aren't offered in the regular TT. The sport package for the BMW 2 Series includes seats with adjustable bolsters, yet they can't be made to fit my form as well as the Audi's do. Nor can those in larger, more expensive Audis. Puzzling.
see full Audi TT review |
| 2016 Audi TT Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
Many people will probably leave the rear seat folded, as head room and legroom are both scant. People much over five feet in height simply won't fit. Even a BMW 2 Series has a considerably roomier rear seat.
see full Audi TT review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Audi TT
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Audi TT.
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mazda CX-9
| 2011 |
4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave).
see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Hatchbacks and
Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all
Audi models.
