Model Year | 2013 | 2017 | |
Model | Audi allroad | Ford Explorer | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,804 mm | 2,860 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,722 mm | 5,037 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 2,004 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,473 mm | 1,778 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,765 kg | 2,022 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 64 L | 70 L | -6 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,410 mm | 1,562 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,455 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 970 mm | 1,031 mm | 969 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,379 mm | 1,549 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,443 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 894 mm | 1,003 mm | 893 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 960 mm | -960 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,290 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,034 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 846 mm | -846 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,943 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,880 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 782 L | 595 L | 187 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 27.6 | 1,243 L | 26.6 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,430 L | 2,313 L | -1 L |
2013 Audi allroad Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Audi suggests that, despite the platform downgrade, the new allroad is pretty close in size to the old one because its cars have been growing with each redesign. Yet while the original allroad felt like a midsize car inside, the new one feels like a compact, especially in the back seat, where both shoulder room and legroom are down by a couple of inches. The average adult will fit, but without much room to spare. This said, the "midsize" Volvo XC70 provides a couple inches more shoulder room but no more leg room. see full Audi allroad review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Audi allroad.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Ford Explorer.