| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 BMW X1 and 2013 Cadillac ATS Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2013 | |
| Model | BMW X1 | Cadillac ATS | |
| Engine | turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 300 hp@5800 300 lb-ft@1300 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 272 hp@5500 260 lb-ft@1700 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,761 mm | 2,776 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,483 mm | 4,643 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,798 mm | 1,806 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,544 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,765 kg | 1,634 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 63 L | 61 L | 2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 980 mm | -979 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,397 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,346 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,052 mm | 1,080 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 935 mm | -934 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,387 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,328 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 886 mm | 851 mm | 35 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,938 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 419 L | 289 L | 130 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,351 L | 10.2 | -9.2 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 BMW X1
| 2014 BMW X1 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | BMW makes great sport seats, with support in the right places and power-adjustable side bolsters. This said, those in the X1 Sport Line feel less cushy, and so less overtly comfortable, than I recall from other BMWs. The Evoque's front buckets lack adjustable side bolsters, but feel more luxurious. While the BMW wins on support, the Land Rover wins on comfort. Another tie. Update: when I later had an Evoque for a week its seats felt less comfortable than they had during the dealer test drive. So I'm revising this rating in favor of the BMW. see full BMW X1 review | |
| 2014 BMW X1 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The BMW X1's interior dimensions also closely resemble those of the previous-generation 3-Series. Up front, there's a little less space to stretch out than in the X3. But abundant headroom. About half of the X1's additional height is over one's head--you sit only a couple inches higher than in the 3-Series. This additional airspace also distinguishes the X1 from the allroad. Rear seat room could be more of an issue. As in the old 3 and the new allroad, a couple of average-sized adults will fit behind a couple more with perhaps an inch or two of clearance for their knees, while a third would be a squeeze. The seat back reclines, but the seat cushion is too low to provide good thigh support. The Evoque is similarly a less-than-ideal choice for four-plus adults taking a long trip. see full BMW X1 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 BMW X1
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 BMW X1.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Cadillac ATS
| 2013 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The latest 3-Series has a roomy, comfortable back seat. Cadillac didn't see this coming, and sized the ATS to compete with the previous-generation BMW. Consequently, the Cadillac's rear seat is considerably tighter than the BMW's or the Infiniti G37's, a little tighter than an A4's, about even with that in a C-Class, and roomier than that in a Lexus IS. If you want adults to be comfortable in back, the ATS isn't your car, but neither are most of the cars it competes with. see full Cadillac ATS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Cadillac ATS.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all BMW models.
