| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 BMW X1 and 2008 Cadillac SRX Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2008 | |
| Model | BMW X1 | Cadillac SRX | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 228 hp@5000 258 lb-ft@1250 |
4.6L V8 DOHC-4v 320 hp@6400 315 lb-ft@4400 |
|
| Transmission | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 116.4 in | -11.3 in |
| Length | 174.8 in | 194.9 in | -20.1 in |
| Width | 71.7 in | 72.6 in | -0.9 in |
| Height | 63.5 in | 67.8 in | -4.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3660 lb. | 4442 lb. | -782 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.1 gal. | 20.0 gal. | -3.9 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 40.3 in | 1.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.7 in | 58.7 in | -2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 56.3 in | -56.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 42.1 in | -1.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.4 in | 38.4 in | 1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.2 in | 57.6 in | -0.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 56.3 in | -56.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.0 in | 41.0 in | -4 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 35.0 in | -35 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 43.6 in | -43.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 55.1 in | -55.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 24.2 in | -24.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.4 in (over 2 rows) | 107.3 in (over 3 rows) | -29.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 27.1 ft3 | 8.4 ft3 | 18.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 27.1 | 32.4 ft3 | -5.3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 58.7 ft3 | 69.5 ft3 | -10.8 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 BMW X1
| 2016 BMW X1 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | When the engine and transmission are mounted sideways, much more space can be allocated for passengers and cargo. Compared to the BMW X3, which has a longitudinal powertrain, the X1 is nine inches shorter (175 vs. 184), two inches narrower (72 vs. 74), and two inches lower (64 vs. 66), yet it has a little more headroom, rear shoulder room, and legroom. A funny thing: according to the official specs, the 2013-2015 X1 had only an inch less combined legroom than the new one. The difference feels much greater. It helps that the seats are mounted higher in the new X1. Even the largest feet can fit beneath the front seats at a comfortable angle. Want to tap your toes while riding in back? Go for it, there's plenty of space under there--a rarity among upscale cars. This combined with the relatively high rear seat cushion means that the average adult (e.g. 5-9 me) enjoys sufficient thigh support, which is often lacking in much larger crossovers. When all the way back, a $300 sliding and reclining second-row seat adds another inch of rear legroom. Though worthwhile overall, its seat backs return to a fully vertical position after being folded. Each of its three sections must then be reset one by one at a comfortable angle, a nuisance. The Audi Q3's rear seat is far tighter. The spec sheet suggests a mere 31 inches of rear legroom, a considerable half-foot less than in the new X1. In reality the Audi's rear seat doesn't seem quite that tight. I can sit behind myself with at most two inches of knee room to spare, vs. about five in the BMW. Still, with a tall driver the Q3's rear legroom would becomes essentially zero. The Lincoln MKC's rear seat isn't much roomier than the Audi's, while the Lexus NX has about as much rear knee room as the BMW but a lower seat cushion and less foot room beneath its front seats. Though the new Mini Clubman shares both the new UKL platform and a 105-inch wheelbase with the 2016 X1, its roof is seven inches lower, a big difference, and its seats are mounted lower than those in the average car, much less a crossover. There's perhaps an inch more knee room than in the Audi. The next Mini Countryman should be close in size to the X1. see full BMW X1 review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 BMW X1
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 BMW X1.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Cadillac SRX
| 2008 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The car is very comfortable to ride in. My SRX has all the bells and whistles with electric seat controls. I often adjust the lumbar support to my needs depending on how bad my back is hurting that day. Heated seats also make for a very warm tush on a cold day. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2008 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Much smaller compare to the R-class. The third row is a joke. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
For how big the SRX looks, it's passenger space is somewhat craped. It's not terrible by any means, but it's not very roomy either. see full Cadillac SRX review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all BMW models.
