| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 BMW X1 and 2006 Honda S2000 Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2006 | |
| Model | BMW X1 | Honda S2000 | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 228 hp@5000 258 lb-ft@1250 |
2.2L I4 DOHC-4v 237 hp@7800 162 lb-ft@6800 |
|
| Transmission | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed manual | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Convertible | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 94.5 in | 10.6 in |
| Length | 174.8 in | 162.2 in | 12.6 in |
| Width | 71.7 in | 68.9 in | 2.8 in |
| Height | 63.5 in | 50.0 in | 13.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 3660 lb. | 2855 lb. | 805 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.1 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 2.9 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 34.6 in | 7.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.7 in | 50.7 in | 6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 49.8 in | -49.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 44.3 in | -3.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.4 in | 0.0 in | 39.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.2 in | 0.0 in | 57.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.0 in | 0.0 in | 37 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.4 in (over 2 rows) | 44.3 in (over 1 rows) | 33.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 27.1 ft3 | 5.0 ft3 | 22.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 58.7 ft3 | 5.0 ft3 | 53.7 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 BMW X1
| 2016 BMW X1 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | When the engine and transmission are mounted sideways, much more space can be allocated for passengers and cargo. Compared to the BMW X3, which has a longitudinal powertrain, the X1 is nine inches shorter (175 vs. 184), two inches narrower (72 vs. 74), and two inches lower (64 vs. 66), yet it has a little more headroom, rear shoulder room, and legroom. A funny thing: according to the official specs, the 2013-2015 X1 had only an inch less combined legroom than the new one. The difference feels much greater. It helps that the seats are mounted higher in the new X1. Even the largest feet can fit beneath the front seats at a comfortable angle. Want to tap your toes while riding in back? Go for it, there's plenty of space under there--a rarity among upscale cars. This combined with the relatively high rear seat cushion means that the average adult (e.g. 5-9 me) enjoys sufficient thigh support, which is often lacking in much larger crossovers. When all the way back, a $300 sliding and reclining second-row seat adds another inch of rear legroom. Though worthwhile overall, its seat backs return to a fully vertical position after being folded. Each of its three sections must then be reset one by one at a comfortable angle, a nuisance. The Audi Q3's rear seat is far tighter. The spec sheet suggests a mere 31 inches of rear legroom, a considerable half-foot less than in the new X1. In reality the Audi's rear seat doesn't seem quite that tight. I can sit behind myself with at most two inches of knee room to spare, vs. about five in the BMW. Still, with a tall driver the Q3's rear legroom would becomes essentially zero. The Lincoln MKC's rear seat isn't much roomier than the Audi's, while the Lexus NX has about as much rear knee room as the BMW but a lower seat cushion and less foot room beneath its front seats. Though the new Mini Clubman shares both the new UKL platform and a 105-inch wheelbase with the 2016 X1, its roof is seven inches lower, a big difference, and its seats are mounted lower than those in the average car, much less a crossover. There's perhaps an inch more knee room than in the Audi. The next Mini Countryman should be close in size to the X1. see full BMW X1 review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 BMW X1
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 BMW X1.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Honda S2000
| 2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seats are aggressively bolstered, but fit very comfortably. I am a 6 foot tall slightly overweight male. The seat adjusts adequately to my height, unlike several other convertibles I have driven. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Fits taller people than other roadsters I have tried. Probably comparable with modern BMW Z4 but I did not try that. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seat feels hard and is difficult to get adjusted properly. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
this car is engineered for speed, no wasted space.front quarters are cramped as one would expect with a roadster see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 6' tall with a 33" inseam, 149 lbs, 30" waist. I fit exactly in every direction. The hip width of the seats is exactly mine, the seat is all the way back, and the back is ever so slightly tipped upwards from full back. Comfortable but see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 5' 9" and 185# and of average frame proportions. The seat bolsters are Proportioned for the Asian torso. So, the average-to-large European butt isn't going to appreciate the tight seat bolsters. This is why the bolsters quickly break down and need re-padding with firm foam. see full Honda S2000 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all BMW models.
