Model Year | 2010 | 2011 | |
Model | BMW X5 | Honda CR-Z | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,934 mm | 2,436 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,854 mm | 4,079 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,933 mm | 1,740 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,775 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,230 kg | 1,196 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 87 L | 40 L | 47 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 937 mm | 61 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,524 mm | 1,367 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,308 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,016 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 0 mm | 991 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 930 mm | 0 mm | 930 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,085 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 201 L | 711 L | -510 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 620 L | 25.1 | 594.9 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,750 L | 25.1 | -24.1 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 BMW X5.
2011 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |