BMW X5 BMW X5 2015 Mazda CX-3 Mazda CX-3 2017

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

BMW X5 (2015) vs. Mazda CX-3 (2017) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2015 BMW X5 and 2017 Mazda CX-3 specs.

2015 BMW X5 and 2017 Mazda CX-3 Specifications

Model Year 2015 2017  
Model BMW X5 Mazda CX-3  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body 4dr SUV 4dr SUV  
      Difference
Wheelbase 115.5 in 101.2 in 14.3 in
Length 193.2 in 168.3 in 24.9 in
Width 76.3 in 69.6 in 6.7 in
Height 69.4 in 60.7 in 8.7 in
Curb Weight 4680 lb. 2809 lb. 1871 lb.
Fuel Capacity 22.4 gal. 12.7 gal. 9.7 gal.
Headroom, Row 1 40.5 in 38.4 in 2.1 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1 60.5 in 53.5 in 7 in
Hip Room, Row 1 0.0 in 52.3 in -52.3 in
Legroom, Row 1 40.4 in 41.7 in -1.3 in
Headroom, Row 2 38.8 in 37.2 in 1.6 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2 58.3 in 50.4 in 7.9 in
Hip Room, Row 2 0.0 in 49.0 in -49 in
Legroom, Row 2 36.6 in 35.0 in 1.6 in
Total Legroom 77 in (over 2 rows) 76.7 in (over 2 rows) 0.3 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum 22.9 ft3 12.4 ft3 10.5 ft3
Cargo Volume, Maximum 66.0 ft3 44.5 ft3 21.5 ft3

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 BMW X5

2015 BMW X5 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2014 BMW's multicontour seats, a $1,300 option on six-cylinder X5s and standard with the V8, deliver a rarely matched combination of support in turns and comfort on long drives. In a reversal of traditional tendencies, the buckets in the Range Rover Sport feel firmer and less comfortable. Though you'll find a commanding view forward in either driver seat, the Range Rover Sport maintains an edge in this area. Unusually large windows are one thing that makes a Land Rover a Land Rover. see full BMW X5 review
2015 BMW X5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
Audi and Mercedes both offer much longer SUVs. At least until BMW fields an X7, the X5 is available with an optional third-row seat. Especially considering the size and price of the X5, said third row is absurdly tight, thinly upholstered, and difficult to access. The door openings are small, and the entire second row seat pivots forward and upward off the floor in an only partially successful attempt to compensate. To provide even minimal legroom for those using it, the second row must slide forward a few inches, to the point that its occupants find their own legroom severely compromised. Both rows are too low to the floor for adult comfort. The third-row seat optional in the Range Rover Sport probably isn't much better, and deletes the spare tire (not available on the BMW regardless). This might explain why it wasn't on the tested vehicle. If you want a usable third row, Land Rover offers the less stylish, but also much less expensive and roomier LR4. Shift focus to the second-row seat, and I found that in the smaller X3 at least as comfortable, and easier to get into and out of thanks to the more compact vehicle's lower ride height. That in the Range Rover Sport, though also not the roomiest or the most comfortable, is better than the X5's. see full BMW X5 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 BMW X5

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 BMW X5.

Be the first!

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3

2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2016 The CX-3's driving position is very good, more car-like even than the HR-V's. The view forward is open. The view rearward, not so much, as the racy styling yields rear windows that are quite a bit smaller than the front ones. To help compensate, the outside mirrors are large plus blind sport warning is standard on the Touring and Grand Touring. The CX-3's driver seat is very comfortable and provides good lateral support in turns. The cloth center pocket is cushy without being mushy. Unlike in the HR-V and some others, the headrest does not jut uncomfortably far forward. But the lumbar bulge is not adjustable. As is, it fit my back well, but many people will wish for more of a bulge. The HR-V's also non-adjustable lumbar bulge was too pronounced for my taste. The JUKE's seats are comfortable, but for effective side bolsters (and then some) you must step up to the NISMO. Worth noting for those of you who get your coffee to go: the cup holders are located beneath the armrest (optional on the Sport, standard on the others). If you want to use them, then you can't use the armrest. see full Mazda CX-3 review
2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
For people who have no interest in a manual transmission (the great majority), the Mazda CX-3's largest shortcoming is a rear seat that is tight even by small car standards. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees pressed lightly against the front seat backs. I wasn't uncomfortable, but felt a little closed-in. A shame, as rear headroom is relatively plentiful and the rear seat is otherwise very comfortable. The HR-V provides about four inches more rear legroom, a big difference. According to their specs, the JUKE has three inches less rear legroom than the Mazda. In reality, though, I had perhaps an inch more rear knee room, but less rear headroom. The Nissan's rear seat might be slightly more adult-friendly than the Mazda's, but neither is a good choice if people taller than me will be sitting in both rows. see full Mazda CX-3 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all BMW models.