BMW X5 BMW X5 2015 Mercedes-Benz CLK Mercedes-Benz CLK 2006

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

BMW X5 (2015) vs. Mercedes-Benz CLK (2006) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2015 BMW X5 and 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK specs.

2015 BMW X5 and 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK Specifications

Model Year 2015 2006  
Model BMW X5 Mercedes-Benz CLK  
Engine turbocharged
4.4L V8
DOHC-4v
417 kW@6000
750 Nm@2200
5.4L V8
OHC-3v
270 kW@5750
510 Nm@4000
 
Transmission 8-speed shiftable automatic 5-speed shiftable automatic  
Drivetrain AWD RWD  
Body 4dr SUV 2dr Coupe  
      Difference
Wheelbase 2,934 mm 2,715 mm 0 mm
Length 4,907 mm 4,653 mm 0 mm
Width 1,938 mm 1,740 mm 0 mm
Height 1,763 mm 1,407 mm 0 mm
Curb Weight 2,386 kg 1,678 kg 1 kg
Fuel Capacity 85 L 62 L 23 L
Headroom, Row 1 1,029 mm 942 mm -941 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1 1,537 mm 1,351 mm 0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1 0 mm 1,364 mm -1 mm
Legroom, Row 1 1,026 mm 1,067 mm 0 mm
Headroom, Row 2 986 mm 909 mm 77 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2 1,481 mm 1,252 mm 0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2 0 mm 1,166 mm -1 mm
Legroom, Row 2 930 mm 838 mm 92 mm
Total Legroom 1,956 mm (over 2 rows) 1,905 mm (over 2 rows) 0 mm
Cargo Volume, Minimum 648 L 294 L 354 L
Cargo Volume, Maximum 1,869 L 10.4 -9.4 L

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 BMW X5

2015 BMW X5 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2014 BMW's multicontour seats, a $1,300 option on six-cylinder X5s and standard with the V8, deliver a rarely matched combination of support in turns and comfort on long drives. In a reversal of traditional tendencies, the buckets in the Range Rover Sport feel firmer and less comfortable. Though you'll find a commanding view forward in either driver seat, the Range Rover Sport maintains an edge in this area. Unusually large windows are one thing that makes a Land Rover a Land Rover. see full BMW X5 review
2015 BMW X5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
Audi and Mercedes both offer much longer SUVs. At least until BMW fields an X7, the X5 is available with an optional third-row seat. Especially considering the size and price of the X5, said third row is absurdly tight, thinly upholstered, and difficult to access. The door openings are small, and the entire second row seat pivots forward and upward off the floor in an only partially successful attempt to compensate. To provide even minimal legroom for those using it, the second row must slide forward a few inches, to the point that its occupants find their own legroom severely compromised. Both rows are too low to the floor for adult comfort. The third-row seat optional in the Range Rover Sport probably isn't much better, and deletes the spare tire (not available on the BMW regardless). This might explain why it wasn't on the tested vehicle. If you want a usable third row, Land Rover offers the less stylish, but also much less expensive and roomier LR4. Shift focus to the second-row seat, and I found that in the smaller X3 at least as comfortable, and easier to get into and out of thanks to the more compact vehicle's lower ride height. That in the Range Rover Sport, though also not the roomiest or the most comfortable, is better than the X5's. see full BMW X5 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 BMW X5

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 BMW X5.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all BMW models.