BMW X6 (2009) vs. BMW X5 (2013) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2009 BMW X6 and 2013 BMW X5 specs.
2009 BMW X6 and 2013 BMW X5 Specifications
| Model Year |
2009 |
2013 |
|
| Model |
BMW X6 |
BMW X5 |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr SUV |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
2,934 mm |
2,934 mm |
0 mm |
| Length |
4,879 mm |
4,856 mm |
0 mm |
| Width |
1,984 mm |
1,933 mm |
0 mm |
| Height |
1,689 mm |
1,775 mm |
0 mm |
| Curb Weight |
2,220 kg |
2,250 kg |
0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity |
85 L |
85 L |
0 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
973 mm |
998 mm |
-25 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,521 mm |
1,524 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
1,016 mm |
1,016 mm |
0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
945 mm |
991 mm |
-46 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,448 mm |
1,473 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
912 mm |
930 mm |
-18 mm |
| Total Legroom |
1,928 mm (over 2 rows) |
1,946 mm (over 2 rows) |
0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
569 L |
201 L |
368 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
20.1 |
620 L |
-599.9 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
1,450 L |
1,750 L |
0 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 BMW X6
| 2008 |
4dr SUV turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Very comfortable,deep, luxurious and spacious rear seating (no middle seat) positioning your passengers in from the doors and with a usable middle platform. Awesome headroom for a coupe style car - I am 6ft and can sit tall.
see full BMW X6 review |
| 2009 BMW X6 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 |
4dr SUV turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
angle of seat back not adjustable. Ingress & egress without roof mounted grab handles!
see full BMW X6 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW X5
| 2014 |
BMW's multicontour seats, a $1,300 option on six-cylinder X5s and standard with the V8, deliver a rarely matched combination of support in turns and comfort on long drives. In a reversal of traditional tendencies, the buckets in the Range Rover Sport feel firmer and less comfortable.
Though you'll find a commanding view forward in either driver seat, the Range Rover Sport maintains an edge in this area. Unusually large windows are one thing that makes a Land Rover a Land Rover.
see full BMW X5 review |
| 2013 BMW X5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
Audi and Mercedes both offer much longer SUVs. At least until BMW fields an X7, the X5 is available with an optional third-row seat. Especially considering the size and price of the X5, said third row is absurdly tight, thinly upholstered, and difficult to access. The door openings are small, and the entire second row seat pivots forward and upward off the floor in an only partially successful attempt to compensate. To provide even minimal legroom for those using it, the second row must slide forward a few inches, to the point that its occupants find their own legroom severely compromised. Both rows are too low to the floor for adult comfort.
The third-row seat optional in the Range Rover Sport probably isn't much better, and deletes the spare tire (not available on the BMW regardless). This might explain why it wasn't on the tested vehicle. If you want a usable third row, Land Rover offers the less stylish, but also much less expensive and roomier LR4.
Shift focus to the second-row seat, and I found that in the smaller X3 at least as comfortable, and easier to get into and out of thanks to the more compact vehicle's lower ride height. That in the Range Rover Sport, though also not the roomiest or the most comfortable, is better than the X5's.
see full BMW X5 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW X5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 BMW X5.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVsSee TrueDelta's information for all
BMW models.
