Model Year | 2013 | 2010 | |
Model | BMW X6 | Cadillac CTS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Wagon | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,934 mm | 2,880 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,879 mm | 4,867 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,984 mm | 1,844 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,689 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,170 kg | 1,828 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 85 L | 68 L | 17 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 973 mm | 986 mm | -13 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,521 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,400 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 945 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,448 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,374 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 912 mm | 0 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,938 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,989 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 569 L | 708 L | -139 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,450 L | 1,642 L | 0 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 BMW X6.
2010 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Cadillac CTS.