Model Year | 2020 | 2016 | |
Model | BMW X7 | Cadillac ATS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,104 mm | 2,776 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,164 mm | 4,643 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,999 mm | 1,806 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,806 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,436 kg | 1,530 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 61 L | 22 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,064 mm | 980 mm | -979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,524 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,346 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 1,080 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,013 mm | 935 mm | -934 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,476 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,328 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 851 mm | 104 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 930 mm | 0 mm | 930 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,217 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 846 mm | 0 mm | 846 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,812 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 425 L | 289 L | 136 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,376 L | 10.2 | -9.2 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,560 L | 10.2 | -8.2 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 BMW X7.
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.