| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2019 BMW X7 and 2016 Volvo V60 Specifications
| Model Year | 2019 | 2016 | |
| Model | BMW X7 | Volvo V60 | |
| Engine | turbocharged 4.4L V8 DOHC-4v 340 kW@5250 649 Nm@1500 |
turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 242 kW@6500 480 Nm@3000 |
|
| Transmission | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Wagon | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,104 mm | 2,776 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,164 mm | 4,636 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,999 mm | 1,864 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,806 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,548 kg | 1,719 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 67 L | 16 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,064 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,524 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,394 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 1,064 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,013 mm | 950 mm | -949 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,476 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,359 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 851 mm | 104 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 930 mm | 0 mm | 930 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,217 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 846 mm | 0 mm | 846 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,812 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,915 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 425 L | 430 L | -5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,376 L | 15.2 | -14.2 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,560 L | 1,240 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 BMW X7
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 BMW X7.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
| 2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The V60's interior doesn't only look comfortable. Even back in the day Volvo's cars weren't known only for safety. Many people considered their seats the best. Many still do. The V60's front seats are much cushier than those in a German car, but they are also properly supportive. One caveat. Locate the headrest to receive top scores from the crash test dummy and it will jut too far forward for people with especially upright postures--like me. "Active headrests" that move forward if and when the car is rear-ended can sidestep this tradeoff. But the V60's active headrests do not. The BMW's seats are much firmer, but their headrests have a fore-aft adjustment. You also sit significantly lower in the BMW, but its instrument panel isn't as deep (owing to its windshield being more upright), for a more open view forward. Your build and impressions of either car's seats may vary. see full Volvo V60 review | |
| 2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Volvo V60's rear seat space also lags the BMW's. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a couple inches to spare, but subjectively the limited space seems even tighter than it is. The side window outline that appears sexy from the outside can seem confining from the inside. Large front seat headrests block the view forward. Behind a tall driver even adults of modest size will feel cramped, if they can fit at all. The BMW wagon has a little less headroom but a couple more inches of much-needed knee room. Also, while the Volvo's cabin is a couple inches wider than the BMW's up front, and feels much roomier as a result, this advantage disappears in back. see full Volvo V60 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all BMW models.
