MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

BMW Z3 vs. Jeep Commander MPG

Chart is based on 9 fuel economy reports for the BMW Z3 and 140 fuel economy reports for the Jeep Commander.

BMW Z3 MPG

BMW Z3 BMW Z3 2001 24.0 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent BMW Z3 BMW Z3 2001 24.3 MPG Highway Percentage 83 percent BMW Z3 BMW Z3 2000 19.0 MPG Highway Percentage 13 percent BMW Z3 BMW Z3 2000 23.0 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent BMW Z3 BMW Z3 2000 24.3 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2001 2dr Hatch 225-horsepower 3.0L I6
5-speed manual RWD		 flat med none 0 10 80 10 60 24.0  
2001 2dr Convertible 225-horsepower 3.0L I6
5-speed manual RWD		 flat lead none 8 0 8 83 60 24.3  
2000 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 3.2L I6
5-speed manual RWD		 flat light none 48 5 35 13 70 19.0  
2000 2dr Convertible 193-horsepower 2.8L I6
4-speed automatic RWD		 flat med light 0 3 50 47 60 23.0  
2000 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.5L I6
5-speed manual RWD		 flat med none 6 9 20 65 69 24.3  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the BMW Z3 fuel economy data.

Jeep Commander MPG

Jeep Commander Jeep Commander 2010 16.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Jeep Commander Jeep Commander 2008 13.5 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Jeep Commander Jeep Commander 2007 17.1 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Jeep Commander Jeep Commander 2007 15.8 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Jeep Commander Jeep Commander 2006 13.8 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Jeep Commander Jeep Commander 2006 14.9 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Jeep Commander Jeep Commander 2006 14.5 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2010 4dr SUV 357-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 mtns light none 10 10 0 80 70 16.4  
2008 4dr SUV 305-horsepower 4.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 flat light none 5 15 60 20 70 13.5  
2007 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 4.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med hvy 0 10 0 90 70 17.1  
2007 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 3.7L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med hvy 5 10 25 60 70 15.8  
2006 4dr SUV 330-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 flat med none 11 35 15 40 60 13.8  
2006 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 4.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 hills med light 13 53 18 15 77 14.9  
2006 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 4.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 flat med light 6 19 40 35 62 14.5  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Jeep Commander fuel economy data.

BMW Z3 vs. Jeep Commander MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the BMW Z3 and Jeep Commander's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all BMW models and Jeep models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the BMW Z3

BMW Z3 Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2000 2dr Convertible 193-horsepower 2.8L I6
4-speed automatic RWD		 I guess I could by a newer Z4 with much better mileage but it is not the preformance car the Z3 is. see full BMW Z3 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Jeep Commander

Jeep Commander Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2006 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 4.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 Mpg sucks. In mixed driving I can get close to 16 if I baby it but driven normally I can only get 14-ish. see full Jeep Commander review