BMW Z3 BMW Z3 2002 Kia Optima Kia Optima 2013
MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

BMW Z3 (2002) vs. Kia Optima (2013) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2002 BMW Z3 and 2013 Kia Optima specs.

2002 BMW Z3 and 2013 Kia Optima Specifications

Model Year 2002 2013  
Model BMW Z3 Kia Optima  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 BMW Z3

2002 BMW Z3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2002 2dr Convertible 225-horsepower 3.0L I6
5-speed manual RWD		 Just as cramped, but the config does not fit me as well see full BMW Z3 review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Kia Optima

2013 Kia Optima Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
The Optima's rear seat is comfortably shaped, and includes plenty of room for passengers to stretch out their legs. Heads are a different matter. Though I'm only 5-9, if I still had much hair it would have been brushing the headliner. The Fusion provides a little more rear headroom, but less knee room. Buyers seeking a rear seat suitable for large adults won't be happy with this aspect of either car. see full Kia Optima review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Kia Optima

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Kia Optima.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all BMW models.