| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 BMW Z4 and 2016 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
| Model | BMW Z4 | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 335 hp@5900 332 lb-ft@1500 |
6.2L V8 OHV-2v 415 hp@5900 415 lb-ft@4600 |
|
| Transmission | 7-speed automated manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
| Body | 2dr Hardtop conv. | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,497 mm | 2,916 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,239 mm | 4,966 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,791 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,290 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,605 kg | 1,813 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 55 L | 71 L | -16 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 993 mm | 983 mm | 10 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,354 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,453 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,072 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 965 mm | -965 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,499 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,473 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,008 mm | -1 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,072 mm (over 1 row) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 309 L | 464 L | -155 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 BMW Z4
| 2011 BMW Z4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Hardtop conv. 255-horsepower 3.0L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
What rear seat? see full BMW Z4 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all BMW models.
