Buick LaCrosse (2006) vs. Chevrolet SS (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2006 Buick LaCrosse and 2016 Chevrolet SS specs.
2006 Buick LaCrosse and 2016 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year |
2006 |
2016 |
|
| Model |
Buick LaCrosse |
Chevrolet SS |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr Sedan |
4dr Sedan |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
2,807 mm |
2,916 mm |
0 mm |
| Length |
5,032 mm |
4,966 mm |
1 mm |
| Width |
1,854 mm |
1,897 mm |
0 mm |
| Height |
1,458 mm |
1,471 mm |
0 mm |
| Curb Weight |
1,585 kg |
1,813 kg |
0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity |
66 L |
71 L |
-5 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
1,001 mm |
983 mm |
-982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,453 mm |
1,501 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,405 mm |
1,453 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
1,074 mm |
1,074 mm |
0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
945 mm |
965 mm |
-20 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,448 mm |
1,499 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,387 mm |
1,473 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
955 mm |
1,008 mm |
954 mm |
| Total Legroom |
2,029 mm (over 2 rows) |
2,083 mm (over 2 rows) |
0 mm |
| Cargo Volume |
453 L |
464 L |
-11 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Buick LaCrosse
| 2006 |
4dr Sedan 240-horsepower 3.6L V6
4-speed automatic FWD |
Wide comfortable front seats. Heated seats are great and the leather feels very good. Lumbar support in drivers seat is excellent.
see full Buick LaCrosse review |
| 2006 Buick LaCrosse Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 |
4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic FWD |
Not enough leg room. No place to store anything.
see full Buick LaCrosse review |
| 2006 |
4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic FWD |
It was not comfortable. The seat bottom was too short.
see full Buick LaCrosse review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 |
Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat.
Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SedansSee TrueDelta's information for all
Buick models.
