Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
Model | Buick Regal | Cadillac Escalade | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 107.8 in | 116.0 in | -8.2 in |
Length | 190.2 in | 203.9 in | -13.7 in |
Width | 73.1 in | 80.5 in | -7.4 in |
Height | 58.4 in | 74.4 in | -16 in |
Curb Weight | 3600 lb. | 5594 lb. | -1994 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 26.0 gal. | -8 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 42.8 in | -4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.7 in | 64.9 in | -8.2 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.4 in | 60.9 in | -5.5 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.1 in | 45.3 in | -3.2 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 38.7 in | -1.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.4 in | 64.4 in | -10 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.3 in | 60.2 in | -7.9 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 37.3 in | 39.0 in | -1.7 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 38.1 in | -38.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 62.6 in | -62.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 49.3 in | -49.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 24.8 in | -24.8 in |
Total Legroom | 79.4 in (over 2 rows) | 109.1 in (over 3 rows) | -29.7 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 14.2 ft3 | 15.2 ft3 | -1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 14.2 | 51.6 ft3 | -37.4 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 14.2 ft3 | 94.2 ft3 | -80 ft3 |
2011 Buick Regal Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 270hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Major seven hour trip in total comfort for both of us. Not one ache or pain or "I gotta get out of this car" see full Buick Regal review |
2011 Buick Regal Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 270hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Since the car came from Opel (EU), it is naturally made for smaller fold. The rear is comfortable, just a little lacking in legroom at times. see full Buick Regal review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac Escalade.