| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Buick Regal and 2017 Ford C-MAX Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2017 | |
| Model | Buick Regal | Ford C-MAX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,738 mm | 2,649 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,831 mm | 4,409 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,857 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,483 mm | 1,623 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,633 kg | 1,651 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 51 L | 17 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 1,041 mm | 985 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 1,001 mm | 934 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,382 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 947 mm | 927 mm | 20 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,017 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 402 L | 694 L | -292 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 14.2 | 1,489 L | 13.2 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Buick Regal
| 2011 Buick Regal Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 270hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Major seven hour trip in total comfort for both of us. Not one ache or pain or "I gotta get out of this car" see full Buick Regal review |
| 2011 Buick Regal Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 270hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Since the car came from Opel (EU), it is naturally made for smaller fold. The rear is comfortable, just a little lacking in legroom at times. see full Buick Regal review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Ford C-MAX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Ford C-MAX.
See TrueDelta's information for all Buick models.
