| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Buick Regal and 2013 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2013 | |
| Model | Buick Regal | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.8 in | 98.4 in | 9.4 in |
| Length | 190.2 in | 161.6 in | 28.6 in |
| Width | 73.1 in | 66.7 in | 6.4 in |
| Height | 58.4 in | 60.0 in | -1.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 3600 lb. | 2496 lb. | 1104 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 7.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 40.4 in | -1.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.7 in | 52.7 in | 4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.4 in | 51.5 in | 3.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.1 in | 41.3 in | 0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 39.0 in | -2.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.4 in | 51.3 in | 3.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.3 in | 51.3 in | 1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.3 in | 34.5 in | 2.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 79.4 in (over 2 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 3.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 14.2 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | -6.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 14.2 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | -43.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Buick Regal
| 2011 Buick Regal Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 270hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Major seven hour trip in total comfort for both of us. Not one ache or pain or "I gotta get out of this car" see full Buick Regal review |
| 2011 Buick Regal Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 270hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Since the car came from Opel (EU), it is naturally made for smaller fold. The rear is comfortable, just a little lacking in legroom at times. see full Buick Regal review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Honda Fit
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Buick models.
