| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Buick Regal and 2020 Mazda CX-3 Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2020 | |
| Model | Buick Regal | Mazda CX-3 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.8 in | 101.2 in | 6.6 in |
| Length | 190.2 in | 168.3 in | 21.9 in |
| Width | 73.1 in | 69.6 in | 3.5 in |
| Height | 58.4 in | 60.7 in | -2.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3600 lb. | 2809 lb. | 791 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 12.7 gal. | 5.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 38.4 in | 0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.7 in | 53.5 in | 3.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.4 in | 52.3 in | 3.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.1 in | 41.7 in | 0.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 37.2 in | -0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.4 in | 50.4 in | 4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.3 in | 49.0 in | 3.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.3 in | 35.0 in | 2.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 79.4 in (over 2 rows) | 76.7 in (over 2 rows) | 2.7 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 14.2 ft3 | 12.4 ft3 | 1.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 14.2 ft3 | 44.5 ft3 | -30.3 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Buick Regal
| 2012 Buick Regal Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 270hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Major seven hour trip in total comfort for both of us. Not one ache or pain or "I gotta get out of this car" see full Buick Regal review |
| 2012 Buick Regal Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 270hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Since the car came from Opel (EU), it is naturally made for smaller fold. The rear is comfortable, just a little lacking in legroom at times. see full Buick Regal review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-3
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-3.
See TrueDelta's information for all Buick models.
