Model Year | 2016 | 2007 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Acura RL | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,799 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 4,917 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 1,834 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,820 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 73 L | -12 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 978 mm | 2 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 945 mm | -10 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,372 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 922 mm | -71 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,999 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume | 289 L | 371 L | -82 L |
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
2007 Acura RL Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
A little tight up front especially when compared to the M35 which is very roomy. see full Acura RL review |
2007 | 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Again, tight when compared to the M35. see full Acura RL review |