Model Year | 2015 | 2014 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Acura RLX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 4,981 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 1,890 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,784 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 70 L | -9 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 955 mm | 25 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 937 mm | -2 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,384 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 986 mm | -135 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,060 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume | 289 L | 433 L | -144 L |
2015 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Acura RLX.